Posts

Creative Problem Solving: Why Your Team Isn't as Creative as They Think

The other day, I watched a marketing manager spend forty-three minutes explaining why their "revolutionary" campaign idea was basically the same PowerPoint template they'd used for the past eighteen months, just with different stock photos.

That's when it hit me. We've got this backwards idea that creativity in business means throwing around buzzwords like "think outside the box" and "disrupt the market" whilst doing exactly what everyone else is doing. The truth? Most teams aren't creative problem solvers. They're creative problem avoiders.

After seventeen years of watching businesses struggle with the same issues over and over again, I've noticed something fascinating. The companies that actually solve problems creatively don't start with brainstorming sessions in meeting rooms with whiteboards covered in sticky notes. They start by admitting they don't know what they're doing.

The Myth of the Creative Genius

Here's where I'll probably lose half of you, but creativity isn't about having brilliant ideas in the shower. It's about being comfortable with being wrong. Loudly. Publicly. And then moving on.

I once worked with a Perth-based logistics company that was haemorrhaging money on delivery delays. The management team kept having these elaborate creative problem solving workshops where they'd generate hundreds of "innovative solutions." Mind mapping exercises. SWOT analyses. The works.

Meanwhile, their best driver—a bloke named Terry who'd been with them for twelve years—suggested they just ring customers the night before delivery to confirm availability. Revolutionary stuff, right? Saved them about $40,000 in the first quarter alone.

The creative solution wasn't creative at all. It was obvious. But sometimes obvious is exactly what creative problem solving looks like when you strip away all the performance theatre.

Why Smart People Make Dumb Decisions

The problem with most business creativity training is that it treats problem solving like it's some mystical art form that requires special techniques and frameworks. Don't get me wrong—I've run plenty of these sessions myself, and they have their place. But they miss the fundamental issue.

People aren't uncreative. They're scared.

Scared of looking stupid. Scared of suggesting something too simple. Scared of being the person who states the obvious whilst everyone else is trying to reinvent the wheel.

I remember this one session with a Sydney-based retail chain. Spent two days working through their customer service issues using every problem-solving model I could think of. Fishbone diagrams, root cause analysis, the whole arsenal. At the end, the store manager quietly mentioned that maybe they should just... answer the phone faster.

Turns out their average response time was eleven rings. Not exactly rocket science, but somehow it took thirty-six hours of "strategic thinking" to get there.

The Australian Approach to Creative Solutions

Look, we're not exactly known for overthinking things in this country. Which is probably why some of the best creative problem solving I've seen happens in tradie businesses and small operations where people can't afford to waste time on elaborate processes.

Had a conversation with a Melbourne plumber last month who told me about a recurring issue with blocked drains in a particular suburb. Instead of buying expensive equipment or hiring specialists, he started partnering with the local coffee shops to collect used coffee grounds—apparently they're brilliant for certain types of blockages, and the cafés were happy to get rid of them.

Cost him nothing. Solved the problem. Created relationships with local businesses. That's creative problem solving without the jazz hands.

Where Most Teams Go Wrong

The biggest mistake I see is teams jumping straight into solution mode before they've properly understood the problem. And I'm as guilty of this as anyone—there's something seductive about being the person with the quick fix.

But creative problem solving isn't about quick fixes. It's about sitting with discomfort long enough to see what's really going on.

Take workplace communication issues. Nine times out of ten, teams will suggest more meetings, better email protocols, or fancy collaboration software. The creative solution? Sometimes it's admitting that half your communication problems stem from the fact that nobody actually likes each other very much, and maybe addressing that first might be worth considering.

The Tools That Actually Work

After years of trying every problem-solving framework known to humanity, I've narrowed it down to three approaches that consistently work:

The Stupid Question Method: Someone in the room has to be designated to ask the obvious questions that everyone's thinking but nobody wants to voice. Why do we do it this way? What happens if we don't? Who decided this was important?

The Constraint Game: Instead of asking "How can we solve this?", ask "How can we solve this with half the budget, half the time, and half the people?" Constraints force creativity in ways that unlimited resources never will.

The Outsider Test: Explain your problem to someone who has absolutely no knowledge of your industry. If they can't understand what you're trying to solve, you probably don't understand it either.

These aren't revolutionary techniques. They're just uncommon sense applied consistently.

Why This Matters More Than You Think

The businesses that survive the next decade won't be the ones with the most creative teams. They'll be the ones willing to abandon their attachment to how things have always been done.

And that's not a creativity problem. That's a courage problem.

I've watched entire departments reorganise themselves around solving problems that stopped being relevant two years ago. Not because they lack creative thinking skills, but because admitting the problem has changed feels like admitting they've been wasting their time.

The most valuable problem solving training isn't about generating more ideas. It's about getting comfortable with discarding the ideas you're already invested in.

The Reality Check

Here's the uncomfortable truth: most business problems aren't complex puzzles requiring innovative solutions. They're basic operational issues that everyone's too polite, too busy, or too hierarchical to address directly.

Your customer service problems probably aren't about training or systems. They're about the fact that your staff are overworked and underpaid, and no amount of creative problem solving workshops will fix that until you're willing to have honest conversations about resources and expectations.

Your communication breakdowns aren't about needing better tools. They're about unclear decision-making processes and people being afraid to speak up when things go wrong.

Your productivity issues aren't about time management techniques. They're about too many meetings, unclear priorities, and the fact that nobody wants to be the person who says no.

What Actually Works

The companies I've worked with that consistently solve problems creatively have one thing in common: they reward people for being wrong quickly rather than being right slowly.

They don't penalise failed experiments. They don't require elaborate justifications for trying simple solutions. And they don't mistake complexity for sophistication.

Most importantly, they understand that creative problem solving isn't a skill you learn in a workshop. It's a culture you build by making it safe for people to think out loud, test assumptions, and admit when something isn't working.

The rest is just technique. And technique without the right environment is like having a sports car in peak-hour traffic—impressive to look at, but not particularly useful for getting where you need to go.

Which brings me back to that marketing manager I mentioned at the start. Six months later, they're still using the same template. But now they call it "consistent brand messaging."

Sometimes the most creative solution is admitting you're not creative at all.