Further Resources

Why Most Managers Solve Problems Like They're Fixing a Broken Toaster

Three months ago, I watched a senior manager at a Melbourne manufacturing firm spend forty-seven minutes trying to solve a staff rostering problem using the exact same approach that had failed them for the previous six weeks. Same spreadsheet. Same methodology. Same frustrated phone calls to HR.

It was like watching someone repeatedly bang a screwdriver against a Phillips head screw, convinced that if they just hit it harder, it'll eventually work.

This is the reality of problem-solving in most Australian workplaces. Managers – good, well-intentioned people – approach creative challenges with all the imagination of a parking meter. And then they wonder why their teams are disengaged, why innovation feels impossible, and why every solution looks suspiciously like the last failed attempt.

The Toaster Manager Syndrome

Here's what I've noticed after seventeen years training managers across Brisbane, Sydney, Perth, and everywhere in between: most leaders treat workplace problems like household appliances. Something's broken? Apply standard fix. Doesn't work? Apply same fix harder. Still broken? Call someone else to apply the same fix.

But creative problem solving for managers isn't about following a manual. It's about understanding that every challenge in your workplace is fundamentally different from the last one, even when they look identical on the surface.

Take staff turnover. Most managers see high turnover and immediately think: "We need better recruitment." They'll spend months tweaking job ads, improving interview processes, maybe bumping up the starting salary. All logical steps. All completely missing the point if the real issue is that your onboarding process makes new employees feel like they've joined a cult, or your middle management layer treats every conversation like a performance review.

The best managers I know – and I'm talking about people running teams at companies like Atlassian, REA Group, and smaller firms you've never heard of but should have – they approach problems sideways. They ask questions that make their teams slightly uncomfortable. They look for solutions in industries that have nothing to do with their own.

What Chess Players Know About Management

I learned my most valuable problem-solving lesson from a chess player, not a business school. We were discussing how grandmasters approach complex positions, and she mentioned something that stopped me cold: "The worst chess players look for the move they want to make. The best players look for the move their opponent doesn't want them to make."

Applied to management, this is revolutionary.

Instead of asking "What solution do we want to implement?" the question becomes "What solution is our problem trying to prevent us from finding?"

I tested this approach with a Sydney-based logistics company struggling with driver retention. The obvious solutions – better pay, flexible scheduling, newer trucks – weren't working. But when we flipped the question and asked "What is high turnover protecting us from dealing with?" the real issue emerged: their depot culture was toxic, and losing drivers was easier than confronting three influential but problematic long-term employees.

Eighteen months later, after addressing the cultural issues, their retention rate improved by 340%. Not because they found a creative solution to driver turnover, but because they stopped letting turnover be a creative solution to avoid difficult conversations.

The Innovation Paradox Nobody Talks About

Here's where most creativity workshops get it wrong: they assume managers need more ideas. Walk into any brainstorming session and you'll see whiteboards covered with sticky notes, mind maps, and enough coloured markers to supply a primary school.

But creative managers don't need more ideas. They need better filters.

The most successful creative problem solving training I've seen focuses on elimination, not generation. Instead of "How might we solve this problem fifty different ways?" the question becomes "Which forty-seven of these solutions are we absolutely certain won't work, and why?"

This approach saved a Gold Coast hospitality group approximately $180,000 last year. They were planning a major renovation to address customer complaints about noise levels. Standard creative thinking might have generated dozens of acoustic solutions, design modifications, and service improvements. Instead, they eliminated every solution that didn't address the core insight: their customers weren't complaining about noise levels, they were complaining about not being able to have conversations.

The fix? Rearranging table layouts and adjusting lighting to create more intimate dining zones. Total cost: under $3,000.

Why Your Best Ideas Come From Other Industries

I've got a controversial opinion: managers should spend less time studying management and more time studying everything else.

The most creative solution I've implemented in the last two years came from watching my nephew play Minecraft. He was building elaborate structures by placing blocks in impossible positions, creating temporary scaffolding that he'd remove once the main structure was stable.

This inspired a project management approach for a Perth construction company dealing with complex regulatory approvals. Instead of trying to navigate the approval process linearly, they created "scaffolding approvals" – temporary permissions that allowed work to progress while permanent approvals were being processed. Cut their project timeline by thirty-seven percent.

Could I have learned this from a project management textbook? Possibly. But would I have thought to look for it? Absolutely not.

The best managers I know are intellectual magpies. They steal ideas from restaurants, sports teams, hospitals, schools, even video games. They understand that creativity isn't about generating something from nothing – it's about connecting things that have never been connected before.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Creative Leadership

Most management training assumes leaders want creative solutions. But here's what eighteen years in this industry has taught me: many managers say they want creativity, but they actually want predictability disguised as innovation.

Real creative problem solving is messy. It requires admitting you don't know what you're doing. It means trying things that might fail spectacularly. It involves giving your team permission to suggest solutions that make you uncomfortable.

I watched a Darwin-based mining services company transform their safety culture not through traditional training or policy changes, but by asking their newest employees – the ones with the least experience – to design the safety protocols. The logic? Experienced workers had already learned to work around existing hazards. Fresh eyes saw dangers that veteran employees had become blind to.

The results were remarkable, but the process was terrifying for management. Handing safety protocols to inexperienced workers goes against every traditional management instinct. Yet it worked because it addressed the actual problem: safety blindness, not safety ignorance.

Building Creative Problem-Solving Systems

Individual creativity is overrated. System creativity is everything.

The most innovative managers don't just solve problems creatively – they build systems that generate creative solutions automatically. This might sound like corporate buzzword nonsense, but stay with me.

Consider how emergency room doctors handle unpredictable situations. They don't rely on individual creativity in crisis moments. Instead, they follow systematic approaches that create space for creative responses within structured frameworks.

A Brisbane-based software company applied this principle to customer support. Instead of training their team to be more creative problem-solvers, they created a systematic approach that automatically surfaced creative options. When standard solutions failed, the system prompted agents to ask three specific questions that typically revealed unconventional approaches.

The result wasn't more creative employees – it was a more creative organisation.

What They Don't Teach in Business School

Traditional management education focuses on analysis, planning, and control. These are valuable skills, but they're creativity killers when applied incorrectly.

Creative problem solving requires embracing ambiguity, which terrifies most managers. We're trained to reduce uncertainty, not increase it. But the most innovative solutions often require making problems more complex before making them simpler.

I learned this lesson the hard way while consulting for a Canberra-based government department struggling with interdepartmental communication. My first instinct was to streamline processes, clarify responsibilities, and create better coordination mechanisms.

Complete failure.

The breakthrough came when we deliberately made the communication process more complex by requiring each department to explain their needs in terms of other departments' priorities. This seemed counterintuitive, but it forced people to understand problems from multiple perspectives simultaneously.

Suddenly, solutions emerged that nobody had previously considered because they'd been thinking too narrowly about their own departmental needs.

The Future of Management Creativity

Artificial intelligence isn't going to replace creative managers – it's going to eliminate uncreative ones.

AI excels at pattern recognition and logical analysis. What it can't do is make the intuitive leaps that connect disparate ideas, understand the emotional dynamics of team problem-solving, or recognise when the stated problem isn't the actual problem.

The managers who thrive over the next decade will be those who develop their creative problem-solving capabilities now. Not because creativity is a nice-to-have skill, but because it's becoming the primary way humans add value in automated workplaces.

This means learning to see problems as opportunities for innovative thinking, not just obstacles to overcome. It means developing comfort with uncertainty and building systems that generate unexpected solutions.

Most importantly, it means moving beyond the toaster manager approach and embracing the messy, uncomfortable, exciting reality of truly creative leadership.

The Monday Morning Reality Check

Here's your homework: walk into work tomorrow and identify one problem you've been solving the same way for months. Not the biggest problem. Not the most urgent problem. Just pick one persistent issue that keeps showing up despite your best efforts.

Now ask yourself: what if this problem is trying to teach us something we don't want to learn?

Start there. Everything else will follow.

Our Favourite Blogs: